From ffed76f91e3623f40d1ebffffc0bc728722c84f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laurent Bercot
+ The s6- prefix is slightly misleading, and probably a naming +mistake. This package is not, stricto sensu, a part of the +s6 ecosystem, and it is nowhere near a requirement for a +s6-based installation. +However, it is a requirement for +s6-networking, which +provides useful networking utilities often used with s6, so keeping the +prefix makes some kind of sense; you can see s6-dns as an extension +to the s6 ecosystem. +
+