From d45679c137a64ea989fbd189d52bf9bfc4f7fe6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Laurent Bercot Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2026 23:57:01 +0000 Subject: Update deps and doc --- doc/faq.html | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-) (limited to 'doc/faq.html') diff --git a/doc/faq.html b/doc/faq.html index ee230c8..acf6e79 100644 --- a/doc/faq.html +++ b/doc/faq.html @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ after -- change.

The source format for -s6-rc-compile is not very convenient. +s6-rc-compile is not very convenient. Why not put all the information for a service in a single file ?

@@ -115,7 +115,9 @@ s6-rc source format will make it easy on those tools. indubitably easier to do in other languages than C), and want to write a program that takes a text file, parses it and outputs a service definition directory in the s6-rc-compile source format, it should also be -rather easy - please, feel free! +rather easy - please, feel free! (There are talks in the community of an +initiative to design a common declarative syntax for service files, with +backends for OpenRC, s6-rc, and systemd. It may happen at some point.)

There are no "Provides:", no virtual services. What do I do @@ -184,14 +186,14 @@ according to your preferences, but keep the same idea) -

Switching from another service manager

@@ -443,5 +444,11 @@ requires adaptation and more work for the admin to use OpenRC outside of that frame.

+

+s6-frontend makes s6-rc +more accessible, but does not provide policy files either. Work is underway +on a policy package that will provide a turnkey bootable s6 ecosystem. +

+ -- cgit v1.3.1