Re: runit-for-lfs at GoogleCode

From: Charlie Brady <charlieb-supervision_at_budge.apana.org.au>
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2014 09:12:52 -0400 (EDT)

On Wed, 6 Aug 2014, Joan Picanyol i Puig wrote:

> * Charlie Brady <charlieb-supervision_at_budge.apana.org.au> [20140730 00:37]:
> >
> > On Tue, 29 Jul 2014, James Powell wrote:
> >
> > > A replacement is something to replace a faulty or broken part. Sysvinit,
> > > in our any many others' opinions, was not broken.
> >
> > Seriously? Start something, often something crucial to the running of the
> > system, and just *hope* that it runs forever? Wow!
>
> No, tell init so that it does restart in on termination. SysV's
> /etc/inittab or BSD's /etc/ttys.

Please look up "disingenuous" in the dictionary. How many systems have you
looked at run syslog from /etc/inittab?

Anyway, we can agree to differ. Sysvinit is broken by design, IMO. And
that's why this list exists, and why most of us are here.
Received on Wed Aug 06 2014 - 13:12:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:18 UTC