Re: building execline 2.0.0.0: No rule to make target '-lexecline'
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Laurent Bercot <
ska-skaware_at_skarnet.org
>
Date
: Sat, 10 Jan 2015 18:53:14 +0100
On 10/01/2015 17:53, Paul Jarc wrote:
> Is that preferable to setting CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS?
It's less of a big hammer. It basically does the same thing.
-- Laurent
Received on
Sat Jan 10 2015 - 17:53:14 UTC
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Patrick Mahoney: "Re: s6 "really up" event hack"
Previous message
:
Paul Jarc: "Re: building execline 2.0.0.0: No rule to make target '-lexecline'"
In reply to
:
Paul Jarc: "Re: building execline 2.0.0.0: No rule to make target '-lexecline'"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Sun May 09 2021 - 19:38:49 UTC