Re: loopwhilex

From: Laurent Bercot <>
Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 11:36:39 +0100

On 18/02/2015 11:09, Olivier Brunel wrote:
> Alright, so let me quote you from that very mail, about behavior when
> using both -n and -x :

  Ugh, my head. OK, OK, you're right. Sorry. Double negations are
confusing and I shouldn't insist on being right at 1 A.M.
  Documentation fixed.

  There should still be an overhaul of forx, forbacktickx and
loopwhilex once we figure out how to properly report exit codes and

Received on Wed Feb 18 2015 - 10:36:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:38:49 UTC