On 17-Jul-2015 12:49 am, "Colin Booth" <cathexis_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 3:16 PM, Laurent Bercot <ska-skaware_at_skarnet.org>
wrote:
> > Oh, absolutely. It's just that a full setuidgid subtree isn't very
> > common - but for your use case, a full user service database makes
> > perfect sense.
> >
> Yup, my use case is very, very rare. Though it's a use case that I'd
> really like to have be less rare because abusing start-stop-daemon,
> backgrounded nohup, and other daemonization tricks to keep stuff
> running after you've logged off is... kinda wrong in my book.
Depending on your cron, users might be able to simply put an _at_reboot
s6-svscan in their user crontab. I don't see many drawbacks with that.
--
/c
Received on Fri Jul 17 2015 - 17:13:25 UTC