On 17/03/2016 18:33, Buck Evan wrote:
> Reading the code, however (in ftrigw_notifyb_nosig), it shows that it only
> writes to named pipes with a certain prefix (ftrigw1) and of a certain
> length (49).
>
> Can we change the implementation to match the doc?
> In other words, can we please remove the restrictions on fifodir pipe names?
Good catch ! But I'd rather update the doc to match the current behaviour. The
current behaviour is actually safer.
Do you have a specific reason to need arbitrary pipe names ?
--
Laurent
Received on Thu Mar 17 2016 - 18:09:52 UTC