Re: [announce] credo - An implementation of djb's redo

From: <>
Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2016 14:24:42 +0100

Well, make has a history of being (ab)used for all sorts of purposes.
I don't think I can reasonably claim that redo will cover all of them :-)
(isn't Ports based on make?)
However after my experiences with it I'm confident that it is flexible
enough for all reasonable tasks. Most importantly though I found it much
easier to get all dependencies correct in redo.

On Mar 19, 2016 21:37, Buck Evan wrote:
> Very interesting!
> We've been looking for a better build system. When the time comes, I'll
> definitely have a look.
> Do you think that (c)redo fills all the (non pathologic) use cases of make?
> --phone is hard.
Received on Sun Mar 20 2016 - 13:24:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:38:49 UTC