Re: printf '%q ' "$_at_" alternative?
This message
: [
Message body
] [ More options (
top
,
bottom
) ]
Related messages
: [
Next message
] [
Previous message
] [
In reply to
] [
Next in thread
] [
Replies
]
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
From
: Laurent Bercot <
ska-skaware_at_skarnet.org
>
Date
: Fri, 20 May 2016 18:08:21 +0200
On 20/05/2016 18:06, Max Ivanov wrote:
> Can't see how it can help, am I missing something?
You're missing the -0 option, or the -d "" option. ;)
-- Laurent
Received on
Fri May 20 2016 - 16:08:21 UTC
This message
: [
Message body
]
Next message
:
Max Ivanov: "Re: Documentation feedback: surprising behavior of null substitutes"
Previous message
:
Max Ivanov: "Re: printf '%q ' "$_at_" alternative?"
In reply to
:
Max Ivanov: "Re: printf '%q ' "$_at_" alternative?"
Next in thread
:
Max Ivanov: "Re: printf '%q ' "$_at_" alternative?"
Reply
:
Max Ivanov: "Re: printf '%q ' "$_at_" alternative?"
Contemporary messages sorted
: [
by date
] [
by thread
] [
by subject
] [
by author
] [
by messages with attachments
]
This archive was generated by
hypermail 2.3.0
: Sun May 09 2021 - 19:38:49 UTC