On 27/05/2016 13:17, Remko Tronçon wrote:
> The wrapper sounds like the best solution in my case
I explicitly did not list it as a solution, and I kindly ask you not to
do that. You are effectively removing execline binaries from PATH, which
amounts to execline not really being installed on your system. I do not want
this trend to generalize.
I would rather remove the import binary and concede the name to ImageMagick
than see execline programs become second-class citizens. If you're not
going to adopt slashpackage, please use importas.
--
Laurent
Received on Fri May 27 2016 - 11:57:07 UTC