complete code heremain.c
| |
| | | | | | | |
| main.cCreate a gist now Instantly share code, notes, and snippets. |
| |
| Afficher sur gist.github.com | Aperçu par Yahoo |
| |
| |
Vincent de RIBOU région Ouest - France belzo2005-dolphin_at_yahoo.fr
Le Jeudi 25 août 2016 8h22, Vincent de RIBOU via skaware <skaware_at_list.skarnet.org> a écrit :
Hi Laurent,
In fact I face my CB in using 2 calls of 'read' blocked on 2nd call throgu 'buffer_fill', but when using 2 'readv' calls it ends on 0 return code at 2nd call, so succeeds.I don't understand why 'read' can block when 'readv' only ends with nothing read.
My CB implementation is :
CALLER if (x[4].revents & IOPAUSE_READ) {
char msg[128];
int lg=0;
ERRORLOG("get\n");
lg=buffer_get(&listener_b, msg, 128);
if (lg < 0) {
perror("buffer_get");
break;
}
msg[lg]=0; // just for printing
BASIC_LOG("msg: lg(%d)\n", msg);
}
CBstatic int listener_read(int fd, siovec_t const *io, unsigned int nb) {
int total=0;
unsigned i;
ERRORLOG("listener_read, fd(%d), io(%p), nb(%d)\n", fd, io, nb);
for(i=0; i<nb; i++) {
ERRORLOG("listener_read 1, io[%d].s(%p), io[%d].len(%d)\n", i, io[i].s, i, io[i].len);
}
#if 0 // blocks on 2 call from buffer_fill
int nbytes=0;
unsigned tmp=0;
// still hung at read when nothing readable
i=0;
while(i<nb) {
fprintf(stderr, "tmp(%u)\n", tmp);
if(io[i].s) {
int addrlen=sizeof(struct sockaddr);
nbytes=read(fd, io[i].s+tmp, io[i].len-tmp);
if((nbytes < 0) && (errno!=EINTR))
return -1;
else if(!nbytes) {
ERRORLOG("nothing read\n");
break;
}
total+=nbytes;
tmp+=nbytes;
}
if(tmp<=io[i].len) {
if(tmp<io[i].len) {
ERRORLOG("partial read\n");
continue;
}
else {
ERRORLOG("not possible\n");
}
}
if(total) {
ERRORLOG("data read\n");
break;
}
tmp=0;
i++;
}
#else
total = fd_readsv(fd, io, nb);
#endif
ERRORLOG("total (%d)\n", total);
return total;
}
Regards,
Vincent de RIBOU région Ouest - France belzo2005-dolphin_at_yahoo.fr
Le Mercredi 24 août 2016 14h00, Laurent Bercot <ska-skaware_at_skarnet.org> a écrit :
On 24/08/2016 11:39, Vincent de RIBOU via skaware wrote:
> Laurent,
> maybe I was not clear enough.
> in my buffer CB, set at init, I used 'fd_readsv' instead of my 'listener_read' CB and it works.but it uses 'readv' instead of my 'recvfrom' syscall. not so painfull but in this way I can't know the ID of peer.
Indeed, that's not clear.
I have no idea what your architecture is, what you're trying to accomplish,
what you're having trouble with and what your precise questions are.
Please detail your questions, and give a pointer to the code, if possible;
if not, please at least write some general pseudocode to explain what it
does, and give a little context. It's the only way we can help you. :)
--
Laurent
Received on Thu Aug 25 2016 - 06:24:04 UTC