Re: Debianization

From: SZÉPE Viktor <>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2018 07:48:23 +0200

Idézem/Quoting Colin Booth <>:

> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 11:10:33PM +0000, Laurent Bercot wrote:
>> > Have any started (thinking about) packaging skalibs, execline and s6
>> > the Debian policy-obeying way?
>> What does that mean? If it's just FHS, follows FHS by
>> default, so there's no problem here. Are there other constraints
>> restricting what a Debian package can do?
> It's technically a pile of things:
> libs/skalibs (the .so)
> lib-devel/skalivs-dev (the .a for compiling against
> lang/execline
> lib/libexecline (the .so)
> lib-devel/libexecline-dev (the .a again)
> and so on. I have sort-of complaint packages that I used to get my build
> chain working for a project at work, but correctly separating stuff is a
> chunk of work. Doable, just obnoxious.

In a previous message:

> ... into both .deb's and .rpm's using fpm without much fuss.

That much fuss includes 859 lintian tags e.g. gcc hardening, rc
scripts for essential Debian packages, a systemd->s6 migration utility

So basically I type apt-get install s6 and it makes systemd disappear,
and all these basic services work after reboot:


Is there a documentation how to turn e.g. 'networking' into an s6 rc?

SZÉPE Viktor, honlap üzemeltetés / Running your application
ügyelet/hotline: +36-20-4242498  skype: szepe.viktor
Budapest, III. kerület
Received on Fri Apr 20 2018 - 05:48:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:38:49 UTC