Re: Naming of execlineb

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

From: Laurent Bercot <ska-skaware_at_skarnet.org>
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 21:34:46 +0000

>I believe the original execline didn't support blocks; then the block
>syntax was added as execlineb; and then it turned out that block
>support is
>so useful that having the old version of execline around was pointless.

Indeed.
https://www.mail-archive.com/skaware_at_list.skarnet.org/msg00867.html

--
  Laurent

Received on Fri Jul 27 2018 - 21:34:46 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Joshua Haase: "execlineb -S does not stop the command from running"
Previous message: Brett Neumeier: "Re: Naming of execlineb"
In reply to: Brett Neumeier: "Re: Naming of execlineb"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:38:49 UTC