Laurent:
It seems that execline will install files to /bin. On fedora, it will conflict with other packages:
[packager_at_rpm-builder rpmbuild]$ sudo rpm -ivh ~/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/execline-2.9.4.0-1.fc39.x86_64.rpm
Verifying... ################################# [100%]
Preparing... ################################# [100%]
file /usr/bin from install of execline-2.9.4.0-1.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package filesystem-3.18-6.fc39.x86_64
file /usr/bin/cd from install of execline-2.9.4.0-1.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package bash-5.2.26-1.fc39.x86_64
file /usr/bin/umask from install of execline-2.9.4.0-1.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package bash-5.2.26-1.fc39.x86_64
file /usr/bin/wait from install of execline-2.9.4.0-1.fc39.x86_64 conflicts with file from package bash-5.2.26-1.fc39.x86_64
[packager_at_rpm-builder rpmbuild]$
Could you provide some suggestion? Or does anyone has some experience on that?
Wang
> On Apr 1, 2024, at 17:25, ericwq057_at_qq.com wrote:
>
> Yes, skalibs, execline are different projects. The GitHub site is just a central and temporary place to hold the spec files.
>
> For skalibs project, I build 4 rpm packages: skalibs, skalibs-devel, skalibs-devel-static, skalibs-doc.
> skalibs-devel depends on skalibs. Just follow the aports counterpart pacakges dependency rule.
>
> The rpmbuild tool supports building different packages in one directory.
>
>> On Apr 1, 2024, at 17:09, Laurent Bercot <ska-skaware_at_skarnet.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I haven't looked in detail, but I'm not sure why you want everything
>> in one single RPM.
>>
>> skalibs, utmps, execline and s6 are different projects. A package should
>> be one project, not a set of projects. A package manager will handle
>> dependencies between packages and install all the rpms that are needed by
>> a given project.
>>
>> Or isn't it how the rpm packaging system handles dependencies?
>>
>> --
>> Laurent
>>
>
Received on Mon Apr 01 2024 - 13:26:22 CEST