Re: initialization vs supervision

From: Alex Efros <>
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 13:10:59 +0300


On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:54:53AM +0100, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> My point is that if it's so much easier and tempting to treat an early
> service differently, if you have to jump through hoops to get something
> supervised, then we got the design wrong, and I'm not satisfied with it.
> Well, it's the framework's fault, and we can provide a better one.

Yeah, you right. But. Runit is simple. Very simple. If you can fix the
design without adding noticeable amount of complexity - cool. In other
case I honestly doubt fixing just _one_ _real_ and very minor issue
(supervising udevd at stage 1) worth any amount of added complexity.

			WBR, Alex.
Received on Thu Jul 24 2014 - 10:10:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:18 UTC