Re: [PATCH 0/4] Add info on why process is down to statusfile

From: Olivier Brunel <>
Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 00:20:04 +0100

On 01/20/15 23:40, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> On 20/01/2015 19:04, Olivier Brunel wrote:
>> I see... Well, thing is, as you said, support for the ready file is
>> already more than just s6-notifywhenup, since s6-supervise takes care of
>> removing it when needed, or s6-svwait also has support for it.
> Yeah. I added the support to s6-svstat, to see whether it fits nicely,
> and it does. So it's staying.
> Available in the latest git snapshot. Numbered release probably coming
> soon, but I'd like to wait a bit just in case we need to break
> compatibility more: I'd rather not break it several times in a row.

Cool; I see you've also added a "tainstamp" into the ready file, that's
good but you forgot to update the doc of s6-notifywhenup as well, which
still talks of empty file.
Received on Tue Jan 20 2015 - 23:20:04 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:19 UTC