Re: dependant services

From: Buck Evan <>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 15:08:52 -0700

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Avery Payne <>
> Alternatively, are there general-purpose practices for breaking this kind
>> of dependency?
> Strange as it sounds, renaming the child definition of a dependency chain
> (which typically translates into the directory name of the defintion) seems
> to be a regular issue. Changing the name of the definition typically
> causes various "links" to break, causing the parent service to be unable to
> locate its children by name at start-up.

Ah, I just realized you misunderstood me. You understood "breaking
dependencies" to mean "the dependant system no longer works" where what I
meant was "the dependency is no longer relevant".
Received on Tue Apr 21 2015 - 22:08:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:19 UTC