Re: runit maintenance - Re: patch: sv check should wait when svrun is not ready

From: Lasse Kliemann <>
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 12:40:22 +0200

Avery Payne <> writes:

>> I think the whole idea of "registered namespaces for software packages"
>> is a good idea and should be supported. There are of course different
>> ways of implementing it.

> Why not keep slashpackage as an "alternative" installation method? Is
> there any reason you can't package both "traditional" and "slashpackage"
> methods together?

Anything can be achieved by implementing additional levels of

At the moment, I am just interested in whether people (especially people
on this list) believe there is something wrong with slashpackage, and if
so, what it is in particular.

Received on Tue Jun 23 2015 - 10:40:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:19 UTC