Re: UCSPI httpd?

From: Laurent Bercot <>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:58:09 +0100

On 23/01/2016 20:56, Wayne Marshall wrote:
> fnord is ucspi, supports cgi, and I've used it successfully in that
> context:

  I wouldn't recommend fnord. I have used it too, successfully too.
But the code is not nice: little attention to error management, for
instance. And fnord is also responsible for the only security breach
I've had on in 15 years.
  I like what Fefe does, I don't like how he does it.

Received on Sat Jan 23 2016 - 22:58:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:19 UTC