Re: Equivalence of bundles and no-op oneshots in s6-rc

From: Casper Ti. Vector <>
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:03:00 +0800

Many thanks for the clarification.
Now I (kind of) understand the difference :)

[Resending again due to forgotten list-reply; will use the following
command to reduce the probability of this happening again:
$ printf 'bind index r list-reply\nbind index L reply\n' >> ~/.muttrc]

On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 01:36:08PM +0200, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> Not quite: if a bundle was a no-op oneshot, you could still have all
> its dependencies up while the bundle itself would be down. It wouldn't be
> a strict equivalence, but a container of sorts - a bit like "metapackages"
> for some distributions, that you can remove once they have installed all
> their contents.
> That's not what I was going after with bundles. A bundle is really an
> alias for a set of services, instead of one service that may or may not
> pull in others via the dependency mechanism.

My current OpenPGP key:
RSA4096/0x227E8CAAB7AA186C (expires: 2020.10.19)
7077 7781 B859 5166 AE07 0286 227E 8CAA B7AA 186C
Received on Sun Aug 14 2016 - 12:03:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:19 UTC