Re: s6-linux-init: SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2

From: Laurent Bercot <>
Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 15:35:02 +0200

On 22/08/2016 14:02, Casper Ti. Vector wrote:
> Are SIGUSR1 and SIGUSR2 not just silently ignored in -S mode?

  Uuuuh, yes, my bad, they are.
  Sigh. I'm not sure what the right thing even is. Should they be ignored
in -S mode? Should they do something? ISTR I kept them ignored *precisely*
to avoid hardcoding policy into s6-svscan; it should probably remain that way.

Received on Mon Aug 22 2016 - 13:35:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:19 UTC