Re: On possibly "finer" dependencies in s6-rc

From: Casper Ti. Vector <>
Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 18:38:05 +0800

Yes, I think this is the correct behaviour: if the user does not want
it, the warnings can be somehow filtered; on the other hand, there would
not be a trivial way to know such failures if the user wants it but
there is no warning in the first place.

By the way, if this change is done in s6-svwait, perhaps the s6-rc FAQ
can mention that dynamic (i.e. without using s6-rc-update manually)
virtual dependencies can be implemented using s6-svwait oneshots?

On Tue, May 02, 2017 at 08:59:05AM +0000, Laurent Bercot wrote:
> Does a warning message to stderr when this happens sound appropriate
> to you?

My current OpenPGP key:
RSA4096/0x227E8CAAB7AA186C (expires: 2020.10.19)
7077 7781 B859 5166 AE07 0286 227E 8CAA B7AA 186C
Received on Tue May 02 2017 - 10:38:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sun May 09 2021 - 19:44:19 UTC