Re: s6-permafailon not acting as expected

From: Xavier Stonestreet <xstonestreet_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 16:32:06 +0100

> Please try the fixed version. If you don't want to use the git head,
> you can apply the very simple diff:

Thanks for your quick reply and for the patch. It's working as it
should. I'm glad I was lucky to stumble upon this randomly occurring
bug.

> I'm working on a bigger release (with some interface changes and a
> major version bump) that should happen before the end of the year, but
> not right now ^^'

Sounds good. So what kind of interface changes should we expect? I
mean will they require updating the service definitions, run/finish
scripts, that sort of thing?
Received on Tue Nov 17 2020 - 15:32:06 UTC