On 17/02/2015 20:34, Roy Lanek wrote:
> The problem is w/ the regular express. W/ s6-2.1.1.0 s6-log (...)
What's that s6-2.1.1.0 you're speaking of ? Nobody has heard of
that around here...
The latest release is s6-2.1.1.1, and I cannot reproduce that
problem with s6-log here.
(In all seriousness, it was a bug. My apologies, thanks for the report,
and a fixed version is now available. I realized to my horror that I
wasn't even using regular expressions in my s6-log tests, which is why
I missed that one. Sheesh.)
--
Laurent
Received on Tue Feb 17 2015 - 21:36:06 UTC