Re: Documentation feedback: surprising behavior of null substitutes

From: Laurent Bercot <ska-skaware_at_skarnet.org>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 18:18:42 +0200

On 20/05/2016 18:09, Max Ivanov wrote:
> so it uses "zero word" and "null word" interchangeably, which doesn't
> help either :) "zero word" seems closer to "empty word" (==no
> magic,just ''), than to "null word" (magic)

  Changed the importas.html file. Is the current wording (no pun intended)
clear enough?

-- 
  Laurent

Received on Fri May 20 2016 - 16:18:42 UTC