Re: Documentation feedback: surprising behavior of null substitutes

From: Max Ivanov <ivanov.maxim_at_gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 17:35:20 +0100

To me new docs make it much clearer now what effect "no word" can
have, but once you learned something it is hard to say whether it
fully explains the behavior and warns about pitfall well enough so
that next newcomer will not have a problem with it.

On 20 May 2016 at 17:18, Laurent Bercot <ska-skaware_at_skarnet.org> wrote:
> On 20/05/2016 18:09, Max Ivanov wrote:
>>
>> so it uses "zero word" and "null word" interchangeably, which doesn't
>> help either :) "zero word" seems closer to "empty word" (==no
>> magic,just ''), than to "null word" (magic)
>
>
> Changed the importas.html file. Is the current wording (no pun intended)
> clear enough?
>
> --
> Laurent
Received on Fri May 20 2016 - 16:35:20 UTC